Systematic reviews of published evidence: Miracles or minefields?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Systematic review of systematic reviews of acupuncture published 1996-2005.
Systematic reviews of acupuncture have tended to support its use, but few applied rigorous inclusion criteria. We tested the credibility of conclusions of systematic reviews of acupuncture published since 1996 by applying rigorous inclusion criteria. Reinterpretation used randomised and double blind trials with valid outcomes or design, and with information available from at least four trials o...
متن کاملEvidence-based or Biased? The Quality of Published Reviews of Evidence-based Practices
Objective: To assess methods used to identify, analyze, and synthesize results of empirical research on intervention effects, and determine whether published reviews are vulnerable to various sources and types of bias. Methods: Study 1 examined the methods, sources, and conclusions of 37 published reviews of research on effects of a model program. Study 2 compared findings of one published tria...
متن کاملTelenursing In Cardiovascular Diseases: A Critical Review of Systematic Reviews of Evidence
Introduction: There is a growing interest in telenursing's effect in reducing the burden of chronic diseases. Methods: In this study, a comprehensive review of systematic reviews of the effect of telenursing interventions on primary care of cardiovascular diseases was performed. The reviewed English articles were published between 2000 and 2018. International databases, including CINAHL, Web of...
متن کاملQuality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
BACKGROUND The number of systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) has increased dramatically in China over the past decades. However, evaluation of quality of reporting of systematic reviews published has not been undertaken. The objective of this study is to evaluate the quality of reporting of SRs/MAs assessing efficacy and/or harms of clinical interventions published in "evidence-based" ...
متن کاملSystematic reviews using individual patient data: a map for the minefields?
An earlier paper in this series showed why systematic reviews are more reliable than other forms of review, such as the narrative commentary [1]. This paper takes this further by examining why systematic reviews which use individual patient data (IPD) are regarded as more reliable than other forms of systematic review [2]. It illustrates how the IPD approach can help achieve the ultimate aim of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of Oncology
سال: 1998
ISSN: 0923-7534
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008335706631